Helping Your Teachers Avoid Burnout During the COVID-19 Crisis

As a school leader, you must understand the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on your teachers. From transitioning quickly to distance learning to the unknowns of the 2020–21 school year, burnout is possible (if not probable). You should know what to watch for, and how to respond if you see that your teaching staff needs additional support.

Revising Curriculum and Assessment As COVID-19 Continues

The crisis-driven transition to distance learning was a major disruption in the 2020–21 school year. However, it also presented an opportunity to reimagine traditional education. If you haven’t already, consider redesigning your academic program to subscribe to a student-centered, outcome-based education model, rather than delivering a standards-based education.

How Should Schools Assess Students Within a Blended Learning Environment?

We anticipate that many schools will use a combination of online learning and on-campus instruction—blended learning—for the 2021–22 school year. If your school is among those considering blended learning, what grading system will you use? We outline our suggestions below.

School Spotlight: How West Side Montessori Successfully Transitioned to Distance Learning

When West Side Montessori was faced with the challenge of distance learning, its leaders understandably had much to tackle. As at-home learning relies primarily on technology—which does not fit the school’s day-to-day philosophy—the leadership needed to ensure it constructed a unified, consistent approach for each level.

Continued Support for the Faculty Is Essential in Times of Disruption

When schools face a disruption that results in financial uncertainty, often one of the first expense items cut is faculty professional development. A growth-focused faculty culture is a necessity, not a luxury. Devaluing professional growth could have serious implications for your school’s culture, enrollment, and professional excellence.

Faculty Evaluation: Essential Expectations

In ISM’s approach to Comprehensive Faculty Development, evaluation and growth are treated as two distinct processes. We base faculty evaluation solely on a set of Essential Expectations that constitute critical areas of performance. These expectations go beyond teaching and pedagogy to include behaviors expected of a model employee, colleague, and professional. 

Comprehensive Faculty Development: Why the Separation of Evaluation From Growth Is Essential

As stated in the first article in this series, “Comprehensive Faculty Development: An Overview,”* evaluation and growth have traditionally been conflated. When asked for the “why” behind faculty evaluation, the first response is often “to drive growth” or “to improve performance,” even though administrators readily acknowledge that it seldom does either. The most common challenges cited to explain this ineffectiveness include: